Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is slightly better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, getting a global score of 80.7 against 75.7. Google Pixel 3 XL's body is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. Google Pixel 3 XL has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto E7 Plus. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a much sharper display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better pixels number per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Moto E7 Plus captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Moto E7 Plus also has a way more MP camera in the back, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Moto E7 Plus counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.