Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the Moto E7 Plus's score of 75.7. Google Pixel 4 is an older phone than Moto E7 Plus, but it is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 has a sharper screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a much higher pixel density. The Moto E7 Plus takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and a F1.7 aperture, the Moto E7 Plus also has faster video frame rates, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Moto E7 Plus has a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto E7 Plus also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.