Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Moto E7 Plus's general score of 75.7. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version and Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version. Google Pixel 4a's design is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than Moto E7 Plus, although both of them were only released 1 months apart.
The Google Pixel 4a features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a has a sharper screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a lot greater screen pixel density.
Moto E7 Plus features more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto E7 Plus features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59% larger battery size.
The Moto E7 Plus shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and a F1.7 aperture, the Moto E7 Plus also has a much larger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality, a back facing camera with much more MP and faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.