Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus's general score of 75.7. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lighter and somewhat thinner device than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, although both were released only 2 months apart. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the newer 11 version and Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much better looking display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Moto E7 Plus counts with more memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto E7 Plus features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Moto E7 Plus also has a much more MP back-facing camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
Moto E7 Plus has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.