Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is much better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 global score. Even when the Google Pixel 5 and Motorola Moto E7 Plus were only released 1 months apart, the Google Pixel 5 is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. The Google Pixel 5 features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much greater pixel number per screen inch.
The Google Pixel 5 features a bit faster processing unit than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM memory. The Moto E7 Plus has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the same video frame rates and the same diafragm aperture, the Moto E7 Plus also has a much better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs.
The Moto E7 Plus features a better memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus has improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.