Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-16 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, having a global score of 81 against 75.7. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10, counting with some nice extra features. Even though the LG G7 ThinQ is a lot older than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, it's design is thinner and lighter.
LG G7 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Moto E7 Plus. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory. The LG G7 ThinQ has a way better display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher display density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG G7 ThinQ has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus shoots clearer photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also counts with a way higher resolution back camera and a lot larger sensor.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a much longer battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.