Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ has an overall score of 84.3, which is much better than the Moto E7 Plus's score of 75.7. These devices come with Android operating system, but the LG G8 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10. The LG G8 ThinQ body is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than Moto E7 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released about 17 months before.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a way better display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixel amount per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG G8 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G8 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. Moto E7 Plus has a little bit better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto E7 Plus also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Moto E7 Plus counts with a much better battery performance than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.