Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, having a score of 78.6 against 75.7. LG V10 is an way older cellphone than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, but LG was able to make it a bit thinner and a little lighter anyway. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but LG V10 has 5.1 version and Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10.
Moto E7 Plus counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto E7 Plus also has a greater number of 1800 MHz cores. The LG V10 features a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher pixels density and a way better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Moto E7 Plus features a slightly better camera than LG V10, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto E7 Plus also counts with a way larger sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video and a lot more MP back camera.
The LG V10 features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V10 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a much better battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.