Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-16 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto E7 Plus, with an 82.5 score against 75.7. The LG V30S ThinQ body is somewhat thinner and much lighter than Moto E7 Plus, even though it was released 3 years before. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way better pixels count per inch of display. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Moto E7 Plus shoots much better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto E7 Plus also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures, higher video frame rate and a way more MP camera in the back.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a really longer battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.