Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus's global score of 75.7. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is thinner and noticeably lighter than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better performance than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much sharper display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a much better screen pixels density. LG V35 ThinQ has much more storage for games and applications than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a really longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Moto E7 Plus counts with a little bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Moto E7 Plus also counts with a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.