Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Moto E7 Plus, with a general score of 81.2 against 75.7. These phones have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. LG V40 ThinQ's design is somewhat lighter and thinner than Moto E7 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better pixel number per inch in the display and a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Moto E7 Plus features a bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Moto E7 Plus also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a way higher resolution camera.
LG V40 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto E7 Plus features a much longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.