Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a global score of 85.3, which is better than Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 overall score. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a newer and way thinner phone than Moto E7 Plus, although it is also much heavier. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a more recent 11 version and Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, so it counts with lots of additional features and optimized performance.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has more RAM. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has a lot better 1892 x 2688 pixels resolution, more pixels per screen inch and a larger display.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus features a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus features a bit superior battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4449mAh.
The Moto E7 Plus captures clearer pictures and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same video resolution and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Moto E7 Plus also has a back facing camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.