Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 general score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is newer, a little bit thinner and a little lighter than the Moto E7 Plus. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, so it offers some additional features.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot better looking screen than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a greater screen density and a little bit larger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The Moto E7 Plus counts with a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better camera than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a lot higher video definition, a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and a camera in the back with a better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.