Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Meteor grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a little bit better than the Moto E7 Plus, having a score of 80.3 against 75.7. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's body is just a bit thinner but heavier than the Moto E7 Plus, and they were only released 2 months apart. Both of these phones have the same Android 10 operating system. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a better display than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a greater screen pixels density and a quite larger screen.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a superior camera than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a way higher (4K) video definition and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. The Moto E7 Plus has just a bit longer battery duration than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.