Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A5 (2017) is a little bit better than the Moto E7 Plus, having a 75.8 score against 75.7. Galaxy A5 (2017) is an notably older cellphone than the Moto E7 Plus, but Samsung managed to make it a lot lighter and somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) features a more vivid screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a much greater number of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution.
Galaxy A5 (2017) features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto E7 Plus, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Moto E7 Plus takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto E7 Plus also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Moto E7 Plus has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.