Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is much better than the Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 overall score. Galaxy A50's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto E7 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released only 18 months before. The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto E7 Plus. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a brighter screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340px resolution and more pixels per inch of display. Motorola Moto E7 Plus shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has faster video frame rates, a camera with a way higher resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
The Galaxy A50 has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.