Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, getting a global score of 86.6 against 75.7. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. Samsung Galaxy A50s's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released only 11 months before.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a brighter screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit superior processor than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A50s takes a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images, and they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega-pixels resolution and a same size back camera sensor, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Moto E7 Plus features greater battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.