Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is much better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 overall score. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 has the newer 11 version and Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and better performance. The Galaxy A51 body is thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference.
Galaxy A51 has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto E7 Plus. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a better display pixel density and a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a little bit better camera than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and a 48 MP resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition.
The Moto E7 Plus has improved battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.