Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than the Moto E7 Plus, having a score of 90.8 against 75.7. Both devices in this comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has newer 11 version and Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, providing you lots of additional features and optimized performance. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a just a little thinner and a little lighter device than the Moto E7 Plus, although both of them were released only 5 months apart.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a more vivid display than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a superior memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A51 5G takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back and the same back camera sensor size, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.