Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is a lot better than Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 general score. The Galaxy A52 5G is a a bit thinner and a little lighter phone than Moto E7 Plus, even though both were only released 6 months apart. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has more pixels per screen inch and a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs in low light situations, it also counts with a larger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs, a back camera with a way better resolution and a much higher video resolution.
Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater memory for games and applications than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.