Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Moto E7 Plus, having a 92.9 score against 75.7. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G UW and the Moto E7 Plus were released only 2 months apart, the Galaxy A71 5G UW is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Both devices in our current comparison use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better processing power than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better display than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a greater pixel density and a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a better camera than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage. The Moto E7 Plus counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.