Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than Moto E7 Plus, with an 85.2 score against 75.7. Although Galaxy A9 (2018) is older than the Moto E7 Plus, it's design is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a better looking display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2220 and a greater screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 128 GB internal memory.
Moto E7 Plus has better battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Moto E7 Plus takes just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has faster 60 fps video frame rates, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.