Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is better than Moto E7 Plus, with an 85.2 score against 75.7. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy F41 has 11 version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version. Even though the Galaxy F41 and the Moto E7 Plus were released only 1 months apart, the Galaxy F41 is just a little thinner and a bit lighter.
Galaxy F41 counts with a brighter screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bit better processing unit than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy F41 captures much clearer photos and videos than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality, a way better 64 MP resolution camera and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Moto E7 Plus and Galaxy F41 count with incredibly similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with better battery duration than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.