Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Moto E7 Plus's overall score of 75.7. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Moto E7 Plus has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance. Although the Galaxy Fold is older and incredibly heavier than the Moto E7 Plus, it's body is still thinner.
Galaxy Fold has a little better performance than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a brighter display than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a greater pixel density, a bit larger screen and a lot better 1536 x 2152 resolution.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus takes just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a lot more MP camera.
Galaxy Fold has a very superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.