Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 overall score. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy M20 is older than the Moto E7 Plus, it's construction is a bit thinner and just a little lighter. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy M20's processor is very similar to the processor in Moto E7 Plus, both have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot better number of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy M20's storage capacity to install games and applications is just as good as the Motorola Moto E7 Plus one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto E7 Plus features a very superior camera than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Moto E7 Plus also has a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Galaxy M20 and Motorola Moto E7 Plus have quite similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.