Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M40 is much better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, getting a overall score of 85 against 75.7. Both of these devices have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The Samsung Galaxy M40 construction is lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, although it was released around a year before.
The Galaxy M40 has a better screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a much greater quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy M40 features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy M40 features just a bit better performance than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy M40 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same video quality and a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a way larger back camera sensor, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way better resolution camera.
Moto E7 Plus features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.