Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 global score. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and the Motorola Moto E7 Plus were released only 1 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. The Galaxy Note 20 features a much better screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, more pixels per inch in the display and a little bigger display.
Moto E7 Plus features a greater memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note 20 features a bit better processor than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto E7 Plus takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto E7 Plus also counts with better video frame rate, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video and a back camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
The Moto E7 Plus features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.