Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 overall score. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is somewhat thinner but just a little heavier than the Moto E7 Plus, and both of them were released only 1 months apart.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has a way better screen density, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a little bigger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior performance than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features much more storage to store more games and applications than Moto E7 Plus, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto E7 Plus counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher 108 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.