Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Moto E7 Plus's global score of 75.7. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and Moto E7 Plus has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an extremely older cellphone than Moto E7 Plus, but Samsung made it just a little thinner and lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much more vibrant display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a greater display density.
The Moto E7 Plus takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto E7 Plus also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a camera with way more MP, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much larger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments.
The Moto E7 Plus features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto E7 Plus also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.