Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than the Moto E7 Plus, with a 79.3 score against 75.7. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version and Moto E7 Plus has Android 10. The Galaxy Note 5 is an a lot older device than Moto E7 Plus, but it is lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
Moto E7 Plus features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Moto E7 Plus also has more cpu cores. Galaxy Note 5 features a much sharper screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher screen pixels density and a way better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Moto E7 Plus has much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto E7 Plus also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto E7 Plus captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a lot larger back camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos, a much more megapixels back camera, a bigger aperture for better low light photos and video and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The Moto E7 Plus counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.