Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a general score of 80.4, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus's general score of 75.7. Although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is way older than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, it's body is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E7 Plus. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a brighter display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher pixel count per display inch and a lot higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. Moto E7 Plus captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Moto E7 Plus also has a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a back camera with a much better resolution and higher video frame rate.
The Moto E7 Plus features a little bit more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto E7 Plus also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.