Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is much better than the Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 general score. Even though the Galaxy Note10 is older than Moto E7 Plus, it's body is lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better performance than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note10 features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a way better 1080 x 2280 resolution. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Moto E7 Plus shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Moto E7 Plus also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.