Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, with an 86.2 score against 75.7. Although the Galaxy Note10 Lite and Motorola Moto E7 Plus were released only 8 months apart, the Galaxy Note10 Lite is just a bit thinner and a little lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note10 Lite has 11 version and Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a more vivid display than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a better pixels density, a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Moto E7 Plus has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Moto E7 Plus also has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.