Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, getting a score of 77.7 against 75.7. The Galaxy Note3 design is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note3 has 4.4.2 version while Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Moto E7 Plus has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto E7 Plus also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. The Moto E7 Plus features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a back-facing camera with much more MP, a much larger camera aperture to capture better photos in low light situations, better 60 fps video frame rates and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.