Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note4 has a score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus's overall score of 75.7. Even though Galaxy Note4 is way older than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, it's design is a little thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy Note4 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy Note4 features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of display and a way higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Moto E7 Plus has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a superior camera than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a camera with way more mega-pixels, a much bigger diafragm aperture, higher video frame rate and a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy Note4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.