Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus's general score of 75.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 body is lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Galaxy Note7 features a better looking screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixels number per display inch and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Moto E7 Plus features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto E7 Plus also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy Note7 and Motorola Moto E7 Plus have incredibly similar processors, and although the Galaxy Note7 has an inferior number of cores (but faster), they both have 4 GB of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution, a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs and higher video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.