Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-16 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note8 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, with an 83 score against 75.7. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note8 has newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version. Galaxy Note8's body is a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, even though it was released 3 years before.
The Galaxy Note8 features an incredibly better looking display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per screen inch and a way higher 1440 x 2960px resolution. The Moto E7 Plus has slightly more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto E7 Plus also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy Note8 counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note8 also has more RAM. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same video definition, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a way larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos, a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.