Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is better than the Moto E7 Plus's general score of 75.7. Even though the Galaxy S10 is older than the Moto E7 Plus, it's design is much lighter and thinner. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, counting with some nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a little faster CPU than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a much sharper screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
Moto E7 Plus counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto E7 Plus also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Galaxy S10 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10 also has more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.