Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is way better than Moto E7 Plus's global score of 75.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10. Although the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is older than Moto E7 Plus, it's construction is thinner and just a little bit lighter.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a way better display than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a little larger display, way more pixels per inch in the screen and a much better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution.
Moto E7 Plus takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto E7 Plus also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto E7 Plus features a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.