Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, having a overall score of 86.3 against 75.7. The Galaxy S10e design is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, even though it was released just 19 months before. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much better screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a much greater pixel density.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM. Motorola Moto E7 Plus has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 128 GB internal storage. Moto E7 Plus has a really longer battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.