Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than Moto E7 Plus, having a 94.8 score against 75.7. Samsung Galaxy S20's design is thinner and lighter than the Moto E7 Plus, although they were released only 6 months apart. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, so it counts with some nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The Galaxy S20 features a much better display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per screen inch and a lot better 1440 x 3200px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little better processing power than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus has improved battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Motorola Moto E7 Plus shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also counts with higher video frame rate, a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.