Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus's overall score of 75.7. Although Galaxy S20 FE and Motorola Moto E7 Plus were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy S20 FE is just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has newer 11 version and Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10, so it provides you a couple additional features and optimized performance.
Galaxy S20 FE features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a better looking display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has more pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy S20 FE features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto E7 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Moto E7 Plus captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera and a larger aperture.
The Moto E7 Plus has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.