Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, having a 98 score against 75.7. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, so it provides some additional features. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Motorola Moto E7 Plus were released with only 6 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is just a little bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than Motorola Moto E7 Plus.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has a quite larger screen, a way higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior camera than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same back camera sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a lot better video definition.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as the Moto E7 Plus one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.