Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than the Moto E7 Plus, with a 93.4 score against 75.7. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer phone, and it's also lighter and thinner than the Moto E7 Plus. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, so it gives you lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a bit better processing power than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 has a lot better screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher pixel number per inch of screen and a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots much better pictures and videos than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality, a more mega pixels back facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Moto E7 Plus counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto E7 Plus features better battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.