Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, getting a general score of 95.4 against 75.7. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is newer and a little thinner than Motorola Moto E7 Plus's, although it is also somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better display than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a bit larger display and a way greater pixels amount per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better performance than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way larger sensor, a back facing camera with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Moto E7 Plus counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a battery life that is very similar to the battery performance in Moto E7 Plus.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.