Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-16 | -- |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 global score. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is notably thinner and extremely lighter than the Moto E7 Plus. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version and Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version.
Moto E7 Plus counts with an extremely better processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a quite bigger display, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a way greater display density.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a battery life that is just as good as Motorola Moto E7 Plus's battery life.
Galaxy S25 Ultra captures greater videos and photos than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a much higher video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.