Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Plus has a general score of 78.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 overall score. Even though Galaxy S5 Plus is older than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, it's body is way lighter and somewhat thinner. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy S5 Plus has the newer 4.4.2 version while Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus features a bit faster processing unit than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Galaxy S5 Plus has a lot better looking display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much greater pixels number per display inch.
Moto E7 Plus has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto E7 Plus also has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, faster video frame rates, a much larger camera aperture for better low-light images and videos and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus features a very superior storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.