Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport has a general score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 general score. Galaxy S5 Sport is an notably older cellphone than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, but it is noticeably lighter and a little thinner anyway. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S5 Sport has 4.4.2 version and Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, so it gives you some additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a much more vibrant screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution. Galaxy S5 Sport features a little faster processing unit than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has less processing cores and 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The Moto E7 Plus features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto E7 Plus counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto E7 Plus also has faster video frame rates, a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 MP resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way bigger camera aperture.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.