Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active is just a bit better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, getting a 75.8 score against 75.7. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S7 Active is noticeably older and just a little thicker than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, it's design is still a little lighter. Galaxy S7 Active features a much better display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a much better display pixels density and a lot better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a processor that is just as good as the processing unit in Moto E7 Plus, and although the Galaxy S7 Active has lesser cores (although faster), they both have the same RAM amount.
Moto E7 Plus features longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Moto E7 Plus shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same camera aperture, the Moto E7 Plus also has a back camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.