Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-09-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is a little bit better than the Moto E7 Plus, getting a 78.1 score against 75.7. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Moto E7 Plus has Android 10, providing you some extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is an way older device than Moto E7 Plus, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat thinner and much lighter anyway.
Galaxy S7 edge features a more vivid display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better quantity of pixels per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Moto E7 Plus has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto E7 Plus, although it has 4 less processing cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM memory. Moto E7 Plus shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same aperture and the same video quality, the Moto E7 Plus also has better video frame rates, a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
Moto E7 Plus features a much better battery performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 39% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.